[Alsaplayer-devel] Update and future direction

oliver oli smoerk at gmail.com
Sun Feb 6 13:25:07 GMT 2005


Andy Lo A Foe wrote:
> * A lightweight stable audio playback core.
> * A pretty good API to the core.
> * A miserable user interface.
> 
> I started work on a GTK2 interface but after years of scripting and Java 
> coding I just don't find it interesting to write a GUI in C/C++ against 
> gtk2's API. So it dawned upon me, why not improve the API/CORE and leave 
> the GUI to seomeone else? I suck at it anyway. Or at least I think I can 
> do a much better job doing the UI in Python, Ruby or even (gasp!) Java...
>
> What do you think?

A GUI in Python, Ruby or C# would be fine. I don't want to use Java on 
Linux, I feel there are too much versions and it runs not very well 
(from a users perspective).

What I really would like to see is an Opensound Control interface for 
Alsaplayer as many people are using Alsaplayer for artistic use.

I don't know if anyone improved resampling. It sounded quite cheap some 
time ago. Alsaplayer could make use of the SoundTouch library (which 
also can do time-stretching).

I would vote for improvements to the core engine and ignoring the GUI. 
For me a language independent control interface would be the most 
important feature (for example OSC). Support for other file formats 
would be cool, too (wavepack, musepack, aac, speex,...)




More information about the alsaplayer-devel mailing list