Survex 1.1.1 test version uploaded
Mark Shinwell
Mark.Shinwell at cl.cam.ac.uk
Wed Oct 13 10:23:51 BST 2004
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:22:45AM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> I used to think we should make all the keys and mouse actions
> configurable, but I now think this is probably a mistake - a common
> use of Survex is on expedition where one machine is shared by the
> expedition members, and rebound controls will cause chaos in this
> situation. I think it's much better for us to come up with good
> controls by default.
I disagree quite strongly to this, I'm afraid: I see no reason why
particular users' preferences should be constrained to the majority
view.
Anyway, this point aside then a decent set of default controls is still
needed, and I am in agreement that the new ones are unsatisfactory.
There is some mileage in keeping the controls the same as the 1.0
releases. I think that a good option might be something like:
Left rotate + scale
Middle tilt
Right pan
Left+mod1 rotate only
Left+mod2 scale only
I really don't see why rotation and tilting at the same time is
desirable. Having tried it over the summer, it seems to be very hard to
control the cave in a useful way.
However, if the particular user wants it, I don't see any problem with
allowing them to rebind the controls. What I really don't fancy is
another example of open source software copying our good friends in
Seattle and producing
> a "tip dialog" which shows a random tip on startup
Perhaps flash something up in the status bar instead, if we must?
Mark
--
Mark Shinwell -- email: Mark.Shinwell at cl.cam.ac.uk
Theory and Semantics Group, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory
More information about the Survex
mailing list