simon-git: putty (pre-0.64): Simon Tatham

[Commits to Tartarus CVS repository.]

TL;DR:
  6903e76 Consistently use &def for %makefile_extra pieces.
  9164517 Another missing initialisation.
  8c09f85 Stop referring to Plink as "PuTTY Link".

Repository:     git://git.tartarus.org/simon/putty.git
On the web:     http://tartarus.org/~simon-git/gitweb/?p=putty.git
Branch updated: pre-0.64
Committer:      Simon Tatham <anakin at pobox.com>
Date:           2014-11-22 16:43:22

commit 6903e761d5e0472b55b9fa7c15153fd0be0c1505
web diff http://tartarus.org/~simon-git/gitweb/?p=putty.git;a=commitdiff;h=6903e761d5e0472b55b9fa7c15153fd0be0c1505;hp=f45423544437d117d103a3406550dcd535c614b9
Author: Simon Tatham <anakin at pobox.com>
Date:   Sat Nov 22 16:30:29 2014 +0000

    Consistently use &def for %makefile_extra pieces.
    
    mkfiles.pl was giving a couple of annoying perl warnings, because some
    makefile_extra strings were never set by Recipe. We already have the
    &def function to convert undefs into "" for this reason, but weren't
    using it everywhere. Now I think we are.

 mkfiles.pl |   22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

commit 91645175f79944c95a4b0fa194357a2be4ee4919
web diff http://tartarus.org/~simon-git/gitweb/?p=putty.git;a=commitdiff;h=91645175f79944c95a4b0fa194357a2be4ee4919;hp=6903e761d5e0472b55b9fa7c15153fd0be0c1505
Author: Simon Tatham <anakin at pobox.com>
Date:   Sat Nov 22 16:35:54 2014 +0000

    Another missing initialisation.
    
    This one spotted in the old-fashioned way, by actually attempting a
    Plink raw connection and wondering why it didn't seem to be reading
    from standard input! Turns out 'bufsize' is uninitialised until the
    first send, which can inhibit any stdin reading if it gets a large
    enough nonsense value.

 raw.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

commit 8c09f85a64ff31d05f37304a041fd766507a19f0
web diff http://tartarus.org/~simon-git/gitweb/?p=putty.git;a=commitdiff;h=8c09f85a64ff31d05f37304a041fd766507a19f0;hp=91645175f79944c95a4b0fa194357a2be4ee4919
Author: Simon Tatham <anakin at pobox.com>
Date:   Sat Nov 22 16:38:01 2014 +0000

    Stop referring to Plink as "PuTTY Link".
    
    I don't think anyone has ever actually called it that, colloquially
    _or_ formally, and if anyone ever did (in a bug report, say) I'd
    probably have to stop and think to work out what they meant. It's
    universally called Plink, and should be officially so as well :-)

 doc/plink.but      |    8 ++++----
 unix/uxplink.c     |    2 +-
 windows/winplink.c |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)